- 註冊時間
- 2006-7-20
- 最後登錄
- 2017-8-4
- 在線時間
- 662 小時
- 閱讀權限
- 60
- 積分
- 2135
- 帖子
- 779
- 精華
- 0
- UID
- 2173
|
國外另一種觀點,有關十字盤於0度位置時連桿應否成垂直之討論,這與樓主diy少改內容不相關 
個人觀點,依結構力學來說,下圖設計擺臂於最大施力點連桿與十字盤盡可能成90度應該較合理,有道理
Regardless of whether or not a linkage is "vertical", the output of a servo arm will only be linear when measured angularly. The school of thought behind the longer servo arms makes perfect sense, although, a thorough explanation would be pretty drawn out. If you look at a Sceadu EVO 50, you'll see that it employs the same idea on it's aileron linkage.
Study my illustration below and you should be able to visualize the advantages.
Naturally, a servo's output on a particular axis decreases exponentially near the extreme ends of its travel due to the fact that servo arms move in an arc. When you setup a machine so that at neutral, the servo arms form 90 degree angles with the linkages to the swash(IE Fig. 1&2), you'll see that the swash will be more active/sensitive around neutral and less so at the extremes. Now, when you setup a machine so that at neutral, the servo arms form angles LESS than 90 degrees with the linkages to the swash(IE Fig. 3&4), you'll find that overall, the swash movement will be more linear throughout it's range. The only issues with having longer arms is that your servos will be working harder and you'll loose resolution since you will need less travel.
In a DX7, the exp(exponential) function under the swash mix menu has a similar effect.
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
[ 本帖最後由 three0403 於 2008-1-5 03:08 編輯 ] |
|
發表於 2008-1-4 13:47
分享
收藏
小蝸牛說法有道理
發表於 2008-1-4 17:17
發表於 2008-1-7 13:07
