找回密碼
 註冊
查看: 849|引用回復: 4

煩轉交臺灣中山研究院:內置旋翼多模式飛行器: AAK9M

[複製鏈接]

2

主題

2

好友

379

積分

中級會員

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

發表於 2019-1-28 11:05 |顯示全部樓層
1.產品賣點及意義:
A.總述:
---(全球第一架)機身上下佈局,可收藏的,剛性旋翼(全球第二個,剛性旋翼的型號),或許是蝶形旋翼(飛碟)的必由之路。(機身上下旋翼,是受飛碟啟發)
---此案革命性地解決了旋翼可以收藏及只用於升降的問題,導致旋翼結構,設計,應用等一系列的變革。它是會飛的AI,自動駕駛系統。其強大的性價比、升重比,結構簡單,可放大性,安全性(配“雨傘”及反應裝甲)導致其可能帶來工業革命。
---除非碟型旋翼(飛碟)問世,否則,這個思路,賭輸的風險很低。它最大風險是:試驗成本(次數、損耗、嚴謹性、等因素),有必要注意試驗方法及減少損耗。
B.民用方面:它將取代大部分快遞業務,並成為房機。
C.軍事方面:
---通殺直升機,一般複合機;
---這個平臺有很大的發展空間:如使用魚鷹無法安裝的噴氣發動機,升降旋翼頭,修改氣動外形,固定翼型的變化,旋翼實度的變化,旋翼長短的變化。。。。。。性能讓你們刮目相看。
---無論有人還是無人,陸基還是航母,它都可以使得飛行員、飛手培訓的時間與金錢大幅降低。
2.備註:
A.它已得到某航空大學空氣動力學教授、軍工專家的初步認可。同時也必須與政府、軍方合作。
    B.它在過去十年,歷經無數次單挑,得不到推廣,只是因為政治原因而非技術原因。
    C.此案有專利,除非原創者聲明放棄專利,將其共用,罪不責眾,否則山寨者必須慎重考慮:
---在成為大規模使用的房機之前,即使不改發動機,就其性能而言,它是如假包換的,受管制、軍用產品。
---即使美國政府也不敢為侵權方,發生產及銷售許可證。(員警如果不提前裝備它高配置的型號,或配備毒刺飛彈,面對它,唯一可做就是舉手投降);
---其潛在的黑白兩道購買方,都足以讓你永無寧日,輕則傾家蕩產,重則性命堪憂。                                                                                                      
3.圖紙:旋翼工作圖,正常飛行,旋翼分層藏於機身的旋翼倉(未畫)內,看不見
4.一問一答:
問:你怎麼知道偉大的波音有限公司沒做過這些方案?
答:A.概率至少可以證明它也有不能涵蓋的外延;現在不是比技術底蘊,而是比誰更出奇制勝,或者說誰更好地運用非對稱打法的設計思路;
B.機身下的旋翼,查不到有人試過:非剛性旋翼(錐體),將把機身切斷,自殺;沒有合理的理由,旋翼放在機身下,被人笑死(頭都切斷),至少要高腳起落架(2米以上)(此案使驅動簡單,減少飛阻,甚至藏起來。)
C.利用飛行模式維持平衡也查不到有人想過
D.都已習慣了柔性旋翼維持平衡。這是捆在一起的亂麻,如果不打包思考,單考慮每一個獨立問題,不可能解決。
問:機身下旋翼問題很多,如下V翼易受損
答:
---尾翼皮粗肉厚,有一定承受能力,結構相對簡單。必要時,用驅動螺旋槳應急飛行,降落;即使每次飛行前後,整個功能塊自檢及更換,也可承受。
---當求生降落在不平地面時,可以應急停止下旋翼工作,同樣轉速將減少升力到原來的6.5成左右,這時把上旋翼轉速加大到極限,聲爆(接近音速),利用機構的自損(下機身裝反應裝甲)吸收衝擊,最大限度求生。地效效應可以補償下旋翼停機的損失
問:收藏旋翼的難點:
答:柔性旋翼複雜的驅動結構,極難收藏,剛性旋翼只有S97.
問:別人的無人機結構很簡單,為何會如此貴:
答:升重比先天不足,通過把材料挖潛到極致,定制(數量少)來實現客戶目標(價格飆升),如:80XX電機報價1K
飛控的成本,利潤空間太高。
問:公軸線反槳不同於共軸反槳,解決扭力打折扣。
答:去查一下CH-47,縱列反槳,米-12:橫列反槳,思考一下。
AB52.png
P5.jpg
DROP.png
NEW5D.png
NEWB.png
NN2.png
ZHOUWB.png
S2.jpg
微信截图_20181028081759.png
席子.png
S1.jpg
SOCKET.jpg
方案.png
平衡.png
锁1.jpg
锁2.jpg

2

主題

2

好友

379

積分

中級會員

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

發表於 2019-1-28 11:07 |顯示全部樓層
我想发整篇文档,这样条理性好一点,看得没那么累,但不知如何发。辛苦你们了

2

主題

2

好友

379

積分

中級會員

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

發表於 2019-1-29 11:33 |顯示全部樓層
巨额报酬:
1.任何人士,只要能成功促成台湾中山研究院、Airbus, Boeing等境外公司购买这个方案,则可以取得成交额的10%佣金。
2.除非他们不认可这个方案,一旦接受,报酬绝不会少。
3.由全世界网民见证这个行动。
4.放心:如果这是天大的笑话,自然有历史学家全力承但。
5.备注:
    A.当我在大陆上Boeing网时,无法进入联系方式的部分。
B.可以让翻译软件进行翻译。

2

主題

2

好友

379

積分

中級會員

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

發表於 2019-1-29 11:41 |顯示全部樓層
英文机翻译版:
Huge rewards:
1. Anyone who successfully promotes the Taiwan Zhongshan Research Institute, Airbus, Boeing and other overseas companies to purchase this program can obtain a 10% commission on the turnover.
2. Unless they do not recognize this program, once accepted, the reward will never be less.
3. This action is witnessed by netizens around the world.
4. Rest assured: If this is a big joke, naturally there is a historian who is fully committed to it.
5. Remarks:
     A. When I was on the Boeing network on the mainland, I was unable to enter the contact section.
B. The translation software can be translated.

2

主題

2

好友

379

積分

中級會員

Rank: 3Rank: 3Rank: 3

發表於 2019-1-29 12:12 |顯示全部樓層
这个机翻译版本,专家应该能猜得懂。破译它比读懂它更有意义。
Built-in rotor multi-mode aircraft: AAK9M: Feng Ru (V5.2)
1. Product selling point and meaning:
A. Overview:
---(The world's first) fuselage up and down layout, collectible, rigid rotor (the world's second, rigid rotor model), perhaps the only way for the butterfly rotor (flying saucer). (The upper and lower rotors of the fuselage are inspired by flying saucers)
--- This case revolutionized the problem that the rotor can be collected and used only for lifting, leading to a series of changes in the structure, design and application of the rotor. It is a flying AI, automatic driving system. Its powerful cost performance, weight-to-weight ratio, simple structure, scalability, and safety (with "umbrella" and reactive armor) may lead to an industrial revolution.
--- Unless the disc rotor (flying saucer) comes out, otherwise, the risk of gambling is very low. Its biggest risk is: test cost (number of times, loss, rigor, etc.), it is necessary to pay attention to test methods and reduce losses.
B. Civil use: It will replace most of the express delivery business and become a room machine.
C. Military aspects:
--- Pass helicopter, general compound machine;
--- This platform has a lot of room for development: such as the use of jet engines that cannot be installed by the Osprey, lifting the rotor head, modifying the aerodynamic shape, changing the fixed airfoil, changing the rotor's solidity, and changing the length of the rotor. . . . . . Performance makes you look good.
--- Whether there are people or no ones, land-based or aircraft carriers, it can greatly reduce the time and money for pilots and flying hands training.
2. Remarks:
A. It has been initially recognized by aeronautics professors and military experts at an aviation university. At the same time, it must also cooperate with the government and the military.
    B. It has undergone numerous heads-ups over the past decade and has not been promoted for political reasons rather than technical reasons.
    C. There is a patent in this case. Unless the original creator declares to abandon the patent and share it, the crime is not blameless, otherwise the cottage must carefully consider:
--- Before becoming a large-scale use of the aircraft, even if the engine is not changed, in terms of its performance, it is a fake, controlled, military product.
--- Even the US government does not dare to issue production and sales licenses for the infringing party. (The United States is not capable of withstanding the ridicule of the world: copying the patents of political prisoners. If the police do not equip its high-profile models in advance, or equipped with stinger missiles, the only thing they can do is to raise their hands and surrender);
--- Its potential black and white buyers are enough to make you never have a good time, but you will lose your life and worry about your life.
3. Drawings: Rotor working diagram, normal flight, the rotor layer is hidden in the rotor chamber (not shown) of the fuselage, invisible

1.Jack-type nose landing gear; 2. Upper and lower rotors (future wing jet and umbrella mechanism can be added in the future); 3. Front and rear fixed wings; 4. Pitch-driven propellers provide three-dimensional maneuverability, so traditional rotor mechanisms can be eliminated. , 5. The fuselage (with rotor box: the bamboo mat of the circular motion, not drawn) 6. The tail, the rudder, and the rear landing gear (the wheel can be hidden in the rotor wing);
4. Q&A:
Q: How do you know that the great Boeing Co., Ltd. has not done these plans?
A:
A. Probability can at least prove that it also has extensions that cannot be covered; now it is not more than technical background, but more surprising than anyone else, or who is better at using asymmetric design.
B. The rotor under the fuselage, I can't find anyone tried: non-rigid rotor (cone), will cut off the fuselage, commit suicide; there is no reasonable reason, the rotor is placed under the fuselage, was laughed to death (head Cut off), at least high-foot landing gear (more than 2 meters) (this case makes the drive simple, reduce the flying resistance, and even hide it.)
C. Using flight mode to maintain balance, I can’t find anyone thinking about it.
D. Both are used to maintaining balance with flexible rotors. This is a mess of bundles. If you don't think about it, you can't solve it by considering each individual issue.

Q: There are many problems with the rotor under the fuselage. The V wing is vulnerable to damage.
A:
--- The tail flap is thick and thick, has a certain tolerance, and the structure is relatively simple. If necessary, use the propeller to fly and land emergency; even before and after each flight, the entire function block can be self-checked and replaced.
--- When surviving to land on uneven ground, you can stop the rotor work in an emergency, the same speed will reduce the lift to the original 6.5%, then increase the speed of the upper rotor to the limit, sonic boom (near the speed of sound), the use of mechanisms Self-damage (lower body loading reaction armor) absorbs shocks and maximizes survival. Ground effect can compensate for the loss of lower rotor stop
Q: The difficulty of collecting rotors:
A: The flexible rotor has a complicated driving structure, which is extremely difficult to collect. The rigid rotor is only S97.
Q: The structure of other people's drones is very simple, why is it so expensive:
A: The weight gain is less than congenital. By digging the material to the extreme and customizing (small quantity) to achieve the customer's goal (price soaring), such as: 80XX motor offer 1K.
The cost of flight control, the profit margin is too high.
Q: The common axis anti-paddle is different from the coaxial anti-paddle, which solves the problem of torque reduction.
A: Go check the CH-47, the column counter-propeller, the meter-12: the horizontal anti-paddle, think about it.
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 註冊

手機版|Archiver|ALIGN

GMT+8, 2019-2-23 07:19

Powered by Discuz! X2.5

© 2001-2012 Comsenz Inc.

回頂部